Dutch Employers Bid To Bring Unions Back To Pension Reform Talks
Dutch employer organisations want the government to enable workers in hard manual jobs to be able to claim the state pension (AOW) early without a penalty.
In a letter published in financial daily FD, Hans de Boer, chair of VNO-NCW, and Marc Calon, chair of LTO Nederland, suggested that the government should also refrain from charging AOW contributions during the period of early retirement.
Jacco Vonhof, chairman of MKB Nederland, supported the proposal in a separate interview with daily De Telegraaf.
The retirement age for the AOW is currently 66 years and four months. The government has already decided that the AOW age is to rise to 67 years and three months in 2022.
The employer chairs said their proposal was meant to entice trade unions back to the negotiation table to discuss pension system reform, after talks between the social partners and the government collapsed at the end of last year.
They were angered by the unions’ announcement of industrial action on 18 March – two days ahead of provincial elections – arguing that strikes would hit employers rather than the government.
“The unions are not only barking up the wrong tree, but are also putting the saw into it,” argued the employers. However, they didn’t dispute raising the retirement age.
In the past, methods for agreeing a definition of hard physical jobs failed as the issue was deemed too complicated by the government.
However, De Boer argued that the Austrian government had shown it was possible by using ‘calories burned’ as a criterion.
He said the country had also made a list of jobs subject to the option of early retirement. The arrangements didn’t automatically apply to people who did predominantly administrative work.
The Austrian list also included irregular night shifts, work conducted in overly hot or cold conditions, work exposed to chemicals and work with severely disabled people.
Unions respond
Responding to the employers’ proposal, Tuur Elzinga, trustee at the largest union FNV, said that it was only willing to resume talks if the AOW age was fixed at 66.
Therefore, the employers should target its proposals at the government instead, he said.
Elzinga highlighted the difficulties in compiling a list of hard manual jobs, arguing that, for example, similar efforts in Belgium hadn’t succeeded.
Credit: Mark Prins
Wouter Koolmees, minister of social affairs, described the employers’ proposals as “interesting”, while highlighting the importance of a joint approach by the parties involved.
Last year, Koolmees said that a solution for workers in hard physical jobs shouldn’t be sought in a definition “as the subject can’t be properly demarcated and would be unmanageable as well as difficult to implement as a consequence”.
UK Roundup: FTSE350 DB Pensions See Largest Fall In Aggregate Contributions
LGIM centralises global trading onto Charles River IMS Read more
GPIF Suspends Stock Lending On Equity Portfolio
The move is to better ‘fullfill its stewardship responsibility’ Read more
WTWs German Pensionsfonds Vehicle Gets €2.6bn Boost With Innogy
Innogy’s new owner E.On does not have a Pensionsfonds Read more
Netherlands Roundup: Textile Scheme MITT To Temporarily Reduce Accrual To Avoid Cuts
Aegon to switch to IDC plan for its staff Read more
IASB Agrees DB Pensions Disclosures Package
The IASB board decided to take a blank page approach to explore whether new or different information about employee bene... Read more
UK Election: Labour Plans To Freeze Pension Age If Elected
Labour promises to compensate 400,000 women who have been “pushed into poverty” Read more